Achtung Interessenskonflikt: Rostocker Grünen-Abgeordnete verdient privat kräftig an Windkraftnutzung

Erst Shukla’s Gold, jetzt Jaeger’s Gold. Die Ostsee-Zeitung meldete am 21. Oktober 2015 einen unschönen Interessenskonflikt, der sicher kein Einzelfall ist:

Kritik an Nebenverdienst von Grünen-Abgeordneten
Johann-Georg Jaeger (49) streitet für die Energiewende: Seit Jahren zieht der Rostocker durchs Land, um Gemeindevertreter und Anwohner zu überzeugen. Der Kampf gegen den Klimawandel ist auch seine Mission als Landtagsabgeordneter der Grünen. Seit Jahren verdient er an der Windkraftnutzung privat aber auch kräftig mit. Jaeger ist Projektentwickler für Erneuerbare Energien, Betreiber mehrerer Windkraft- und Solaranlagen.

Weiterlesen in der Ostsee-Zeitung.

———————–

Auf einer kürzlichen internationalen Konferenz sollen sich hochrangige Richter auch mit der Frage beschäftigt haben, ob das Anzweifeln der IPCC-Linie demnächst vielleicht unter Strafe gestellt werden könnte. Bitter. Dann müsssen wir das Blog hier wohl demnächst schließen. Lesen Sie hierzu die aufrüttelnden Berichte von Christopher Booker und Donna Laframboise (1, 2, 3).

 

———————–

Noch 2010 sorgte sich der Focus, dass die Eidechsen wohl bald aussterben. Zum Glück nicht ganz richtig, wie sich jetzt herausstellte. Ein Forscherteam der Universität Göteborg fand nun heraus, dass die schwedischen Sandeidechsen sogar vom Klimawandel profitieren. Am 7. Oktober 2015 gab Biomed Central per Pressemitteilung bekannt:

Climate change could benefit northern lizards

Higher temperatures result in Swedish sand lizards laying their eggs earlier, which leads to better fitness and survival in their offspring, according to research published in the open access journal BMC Evolutionary Biology

Higher temperatures result in Swedish sand lizards laying their eggs earlier, which leads to better fitness and survival in their offspring, according to research published in the open access journal BMC Evolutionary Biology. The findings indicate that climate change could have positive effects on this population of high-latitude lizard, but the authors warn that climate change is likely to affect a whole suite of traits, in addition to egg-laying date, which together would have an unknown combined effect on survival and reproductive success.

The global climate is changing more rapidly than ever before, with large effects on ecosystems, species and populations worldwide. Some species are able to adjust to these changes by adapting or dispersing to new locations, while others have been removed from their fitness peaks and have decreased in numbers. One of the most frequently reported responses to recent climate change are shifts in timing of lifecycle events, such as emergence from hibernation, migration and breeding (including egg-laying).

Lead author Gabriella Ljungstrom from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden, said: “Shifts in the timing of lifecycle events in response to climate change is widespread, but the crucial question is how this affects an animal or plant’s fitness. Are these shifts adaptive and will thus help the population to persist under climate change, or not? “For this high-latitude population, our results contrast global projections of extinction risk for lizards as a result of climate change. This highlights the importance of taking spatial differences into account when predicting future effects of climate change on species and populations.”

Lizards rely on external sources of heat to regulate their body temperature, meaning that ambient temperature has a strong influence on many of their basic physiological functions, as well as on their timing of lifecycle events. As tropical lizard species currently live in climates very close to their optimal body temperatures, their fitness is predicted to decrease with increasing temperature. In contrast, at high latitudes, warming could bring individuals closer to their optimum temperature and thereby even enhance fitness.

The researchers analysed records of over 350 female Swedish sand lizards (Lacerta agilis) over 15 years, and looked at the effects of local temperature on egg-laying date. Earlier egg-laying is strongly linked to reproductive success in this species and, through its relationship with hatching date, is also connected to offspring fitness and survival in reptiles at large. Shifts in this trait may therefore have potentially large effects on population survival.

The results showed that female sand lizards laid eggs earlier in relatively warmer years. This means that the females respond adaptively to fairly rapid annual changes in ambient temperature, and indicates that climate warming may have some positive fitness effects in this high-latitude lizard, at least in the short term. The authors say that having such a long-term dataset of a wild population is rare, especially for a reptile, and is important for understanding how individuals, populations and species respond in nature today, and are likely to respond in the future.

———————–

Bleiben wir noch kurz bei den Echsen. Ein anderes Paper zu Eidechsen im Klimawandel musste jetzt zurückgezogen werden, da sich die Methodik als fehlerhaft erwies. Francisco Ferri-Yáñez und Miguel Araújo hatten im Feruar 2015 in einer in Ecography erschienenen Studie behauptet, den Eidechsen würde der Klimawandel besonders zusetzen, da sie sich sogar schneller als die globale Erwärmung aufheizen würden. Das stellte sich jedoch als großer Murks heraus, wie Retraction Watch am 17. September 2015 berichtete:

Lizards aren’t getting hotter faster than the planet after all, says retraction
A paper that raised alarms by suggesting lizards were warming even faster than the planet has been retracted after the authors employed the wrong method to measure temperatures. Some scientists thought that, because of the way lizards retain heat to regulate their cold-blooded bodies, they might be more sensitive to temperature changes. Well, not in this case. The paper has been retracted from Ecography because the scientists erred in calculating the “radiative conductance of the animal” — basically, how much heat it can get rid of — such that the “broad-scale” conclusions of the study are invalid.

Weiterlesen bei Retraction Watch.